|
07-29-2009, 05:37 PM
|
#41
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 402
|
398/367
__________________
99 Integra GSR ... Beater For sale PM for info.
1987 Mustang Coupe..4cyl 5 speed
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 05:37 PM
|
#42
|
|
Palshctib
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dayton
Posts: 2,936
|
1300
__________________
If you are taking the time to read this, there is a high probability that you're obese.
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 06:17 PM
|
#43
|
|
CSS Rep King
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mason
Age: 36
Posts: 7,078
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsmawd350
well how am i supposed to guess HP when i dont know what your car traps or weighs?  |
It ran low 11's at 130ish last year with the same shitbox tuning as mine. Power FC's usually yield +30hp over chipped stock ECU's... |
|
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 06:24 PM
|
#44
|
|
Css RICER
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Harrison
Posts: 1,103
|
518/399
__________________
94 Frost White Acura Integra Ls
98 Champ White Integra Type R
07 White Diamond Pearl Acura TL Type S
07 Jet powered Gixxxer 1000 - gone 
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 06:34 PM
|
#45
|
|
6.x liter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: idk
Age: 36
Posts: 10,705
|
Drag/Street S13 Silvia runs 11.0 @ 131.33 on Nitto 555R's. Making 391hp at the wheels. Thanks to Advance Motor Mechanics and Just Engine Management! ... Silvia SR20DET SR20 Drag S13 GT3037S
10.4 @ 136 1.705 60ft, HKS GT3037S @ 25 psi, 503hp @ wheels on E85.
few track times i found that seemed similar with accompanying dyno numbers. should help judge
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 06:59 PM
|
#46
|
|
Burnoffs
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Not in A Trailer
Age: 39
Posts: 6,970
|
Dyno #s don't mean dick. Its a tool for tuning. Just ask Kevin LOL /thread
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 06:59 PM
|
#47
|
|
CSS Rep King
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mason
Age: 36
Posts: 7,078
|
I always thought it would make a little over 500. But since dyno numbers are usually a disappointment, I went a little lower
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 07:12 PM
|
#48
|
|
.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: .
Age: 36
Posts: 9,312
|
im talking pump gas here, 20 psi. last year it trapped like 122 or something on pump. the 131 trap was on 29psi and race gas. on race gas at 30psi i dont see it making less than 500hp seeing that people make 450+ on the exact same setup on 20psi and pump gas.
kent, i agree dynos are a tool for tuning. the number is just an ego booster. im really wanting the car to run well so i can drive it more than make a number that sounds good.
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 07:14 PM
|
#49
|
|
Burnoffs
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Not in A Trailer
Age: 39
Posts: 6,970
|
My dyno #s suck dick but I could care less. Just makes people think my shit is slow since every shop seems to crank up the correction factor on their dynos these days
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 08:37 PM
|
#50
|
|
Kevin Knows
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fairfield, OH
Age: 41
Posts: 18,588
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitedime
Dyno #s don't mean dick. Its a tool for tuning. Just ask Kevin LOL /thread
|
In attempt to belittle me, Kent is actually right. It doesn't matter what the final number is, its just a tool to maximize your torque/hp. But if I had to guess
477/356. Keep in mind I have NO clue what similar cars put down. Are you doing it on pump/race, and what boost?
__________________
Steamroller
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 08:45 PM
|
#51
|
|
Best I know of
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Uranus
Age: 42
Posts: 11,296
|
If Kent wanted to belittle you, couldnt he just stand next to you?
__________________
I am the 53%
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 10:03 PM
|
#52
|
|
.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: .
Age: 36
Posts: 9,312
|
pump gas ans 20-22psi.
|
|
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 11:11 PM
|
#53
|
|
Kevin Knows
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fairfield, OH
Age: 41
Posts: 18,588
|
Oh, in that case I'll guess 439/353
|
|
|
|
|
07-30-2009, 12:42 AM
|
#54
|
|
Mistake Boner
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cincity
Posts: 10,716
|
FYI, a car that had made 165-170 NA whp on a dynojet only made 130 NA whp on the Dynapack at TPR, the owner was heartbroke.
Till he went to a autox next day, was the fastest fendered car there in a CRX and looking at the logs....
Quote:
#s on the dyno were bit depressing, but the motor only had ~15min of run time before bolting it up. New wheel bearing friction and crappy rainy weather may have played a part.
However, at the shake down run at OSU yesterday, I was the fastest fendered car by over 2 sec, and had the fastest overall PAX indexed time as well as winning my class. A lot better than I expected considering the HP #s and this being only the 2nd time in 3 years I have driven the car. Granted, all the fast guys were at the pro in Toledo. Divisonals in 2 weeks will be a far better barometer of where we stand.
|
Quote:
|
In better news, I compared datalogs from last year at the Peru tour and Sunday's runs. Looking at about 30 points in 2nd gear full throttle sections on 12 different runs the new motor avarages a slightly better rate than last years motor. The average came to 1034rpm/sec increase vs. 993rpm/sec. The interesting thing was intake temps at Peru last year were between 89* and 107*, it was far warmer sunday, the ecu logged intake temps ~130*! I am beginning to believe despite the low dyno #s the engine is actually pretty strong.
|
Lets race dyno numbers!!!!!!
Kevin, this driver is as "anal" as you about building and setup. Likely just as much of a puny guy as well!
Last edited by Mista Bone; 07-30-2009 at 12:44 AM..
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 AM.
|
|
Your Privacy Choices